Reviews
The University is committed to securing success for our students and the Greater Western Sydney region through innovation and discovery in a dynamic and technology-enabled world. One mechanism the University uses to assist in this is to undertake reviews. A review seeks to identify areas of good practice, areas requiring improvement and recommended actions.
School Reviews
The University has a cyclical review process, requiring all Schools to be formally reviewed every five years. The review process entails the production of a self-assessment report, which is considered by an independent review panel for commendations and recommendations. Implementation of review outcomes is overseen by the University Executive and Academic Senate. Reviews are an opportunity to disseminate and implement best practice. Review reports and implementation plans are available to staff with a University login.
Stakeholder input is important to inform the outcome of a review. To make a submission to a School Review on matters relevant to the Terms of Reference please complete the submission form or email reviews@westernsydney.edu.au. All submissions will be treated as confidential. If you prefer, you can mail your comments, marked "confidential" to School Reviews, Office of Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice President (Academic), Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751.
2023 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Social Sciences (opens in a new window) (SoSS) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report | Action Plan |
School of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences (opens in a new window) (SoCDMS) | Terms of Reference | Panel Report | Action Plan |
Completed School Reviews are listed below.
2022 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Health Sciences (opens in a new window) (SoHS) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
School of Science (opens in a new window) (SoSc) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report | Action Plan |
School Reviews 2016-2021 - Reviewed against Strategic Plan: Securing Success
The University has a cyclical review process, requiring all Schools to be formally reviewed every five years. The review process entails the production of a self-assessment report, which is considered by an independent review panel for commendations and recommendations. Implementation of review outcomes is overseen by the University Executive and Academic Senate. Reviews are an opportunity to disseminate and implement best practice. Review reports and implementation plans are available to staff with a University login.
Completed School Reviews are listed below.
2021 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Medicine (opens in a new window) (SoM) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report
(opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan
(opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
School of Psychology (opens in a new window) (SoP) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
2020 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Law (opens in a new window) (SoL) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
2019 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Nursing and Midwifery (opens in a new window) (SoNM) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
School of Business (opens in a new window) (SoB) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login |
2018 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Education (opens in a new window) (SoE) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
School of Humanities and Communication Arts (opens in a new window) (SoHCA) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
2017 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics (opens in a new window) (SCEM) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
School of Science and Health (opens in a new window) (SoSH) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
2016 Reviews | |||
---|---|---|---|
School of Medicine (opens in a new window) (SoM) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
School of Social Sciences and Psychology (opens in a new window) (SoSSP) | Terms of Reference (opens in a new window) | Panel Report (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login | Action Plan (opens in a new window) Document requires a University login Action Plan complete |
Support for School Reviews
The Office of Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice President (Academic) will provide support to Schools during the School Review process. This includes providing:
- a template and standard set of data for the School self-assessment report
- advice and assistance on drafting the self-assessment report
- advice on interpreting the standard data set
- advice on benchmark analysis
- comments on the draft self-assessment report before finalising for the panel
- drafting of the review report on behalf of the panel
- assistance to the School in developing an action plan
- monitoring of all timeframes and providing reminders to the School as required.
Course Reviews/Biennial Course Reports
The University requires all Schools to undertake biennial reviews of undergraduate and postgraduate coursework performance data. This biennial review process enables continual improvement and reports on initiatives implemented at the school and program level to improve key performance indicators. The review process is overseen by the Office of Student and University Planning division within the Office of the Vice-President, People and Advancement and reported to the Senate Education Committee.
Institute and Research Centre/Group Reviews
The University undertakes regular reviews of Institutes and Research Centres/Groups.
Reviews of the following Institutes/Centres/Groups were coordinated by the Office of the DVCR&D:
Research Centres and Groups (opens in a new window) 2016 Review Report
Digital Humanities Group
Centre for Educational Research
Centre for Health Research
Centre for Research Mathematics
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment (opens in a new window) 2016 Review Report
Institute for Culture & Society (opens in a new window) 2016 Review Report
MARCS Institute (opens in a new window) 2016 Review Report
Thematic Reviews
Additional documentation
- University Reviews Policy (opens in a new window)
- Guidelines for School Reviews (PDF, 233.19 KB) (opens in a new window)
- Terms of Reference for School Reviews (PDF, 115.85 KB) (opens in a new window)
- Timetable for School Reviews (PDF, 164.69 KB) (opens in a new window)
For further information, please contact us.
Mobile options: