References

  • Björklund, T. A. (2013). Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices. Design Studies, 34(2), 135–160.
  • Çalik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students’ conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 651–676.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
  • Davis, R. B. (1983a). The Development of the Concept of “Fraction” from Grade Two through Grade Twelve. Final report. National Institute of Education, Washington DC, 179.
  • Davis, R. B. (1983b). Diagnosis and Evaluation in Mathematics Instruction Making Contact with Students’ Mental Representations. In Essential knowledge for beginning educators. Smith, David C. (Ed). American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
  • Dixon, R. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2011). Experts vs. Novices: Differences in How Mental Representations are Used in Engineering Design. Journal of Technology Education, 23(1).
  • Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early Identification and Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
  • Gersten, R., Clarke, B., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Historical and contemporary perspectives on mathematical learning disabilities. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 7-28). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (1997). The kinds of mental representations‐‐models, propositions and images‐‐used by college physics students regarding the concept of field. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 711–724.
  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.
  • Hinton, G. (1979). Some Demonstrations of the Effects of Structural Descriptions in Mental Imagery. Cognitive Science, 3, 231–250.
  • Ibrahim, B., & Rebello, N. S. (2013). Role of mental representations in problem solving: Students’ approaches to nondirected tasks. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020106.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
  • Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342.
  • Lavigne, N. C., Salkind, S. J., & Yan, J. (2008). Exploring college students’ mental representations of inferential statistics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(1), 11–32.
  • McGonnell, M. (2011). What are they counting on? An investigation of the role of working memory in math difficulties in elementary school-age and university students. 180.
  • Norman, D. 1983. “Some observations on mental models”. In Mental models, Edited by: Centnerend, D. and Stevens, A. 6–14. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbeum Associetes.
  • Paton, M. (2018). Why is it okay to say you can’t do maths? QED. https://medium.com/q-e-d/why-is-it-ok-to-say-you-cant-do-maths-18b4ff5a12ea
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Eduction, 66(2), 211–227.
  • Redish, E. F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 62(9), 796–803.
  • Rosnick, P., & Clement, J. (1980). Learning without understanding: The effect of tutoring strategies on algebra misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(1), 3–27.
  • Savelsbergh, E. (1998). Improving mental representations in physics problem solving. Universiteit Twente.
  • Sousa, D. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Corwin Press.
  • Suh, J., & Moyer, P. S. (2007). The application of dual coding theory in multi-representational virtual mathematics environments. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 209–216.
  • Young, S. C. (1982). The mental representation of geometrical knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(2), 123–144.